Friday, May 15, 2020

The Stranger Analysis - 1837 Words

The Stranger: Analysis Author: Albert Camus Pierre Palmer English II. Period #5 Date: 10/4/9 copyright, by Pierre Palmer I. Biographical Insights A. Albert Camus cultures consist of being a novelist, literature and short story writer of many books. He wrote an essay on the state of Muslims in Algeria, causing him to lose his job and he moved to Paris. Albert Camus also joined the French resistance against the Nazis and became an editor of Combat, an underground newspaper. He was dissatisfied with the editorial of the Board and left the underground newspaper. B. Albert Camus, son of a working-class family, was born in Algeria in 1913, in an extreme poverty area. He spent the early years of his life in North Africa, where he†¦show more content†¦A. The people in this short quote is Monsieur as the judge is talking to him. The judge dont think Monsieur believe in Jesus because Monsieur is always talking about how he does not care about anything and he rather just be in jail where he belongs. B. The quote that I think the author is trying to carry out through the story is the second quote I wrote down, because the author is saying that you need to repent and ask for forgiveness to God. Monsieur lawyer keeps telling him about Jesus and telling Monsieur that he needs to forget about the wrong things that he did in life and repent to God, but Monsieur being big headed is not going to listen because he think what he did is wrong and he should pay the price for what he did. C. The allusion that Albert Camus is trying to get at, is that people believed in antichrist and Albert is trying to say that if you do something wrong in life you can always repent and ask God for forgiveness. V. Representative Passage on Tone and Authors Philosophy After a short time silence, he stood up and told me that he wanted to help me, that I interested him, and that, with Gods help, he would do something for me. A. I think this passage tell us about the author prospective because he is telling us that if you ask for help and if you want the help it will happened. So what I am trying to say is that I if you are not a Christian and you have a friend that believe in Jesus and if youShow MoreRelatedThe Little Stranger Analysis1114 Words   |  5 PagesYuliya Zubrilina Text analysis of â€Å"The little stranger† by Sarah Waters â€Å"The Little Stranger†Ã‚  is a 2009  gothic novel  written by  Sarah Waters. It is a  ghost story  set in a dilapidated mansion in  Warwickshire, England  in the 1940s. This novel features a male narrator, a country doctor who makes friends with a family with faded fortunes left simply with a very old estate that is crumbling around them. The stress of reconciling the state of their  finances  with the familial responsibility of keepingRead MoreLiterary Analysis Of The Stranger 2900 Words   |  12 Pages Curtis Poindexter Professor Slattum English M01B 11 December 2014 Literary Analysis: The Stranger The novel The Stranger is a first-person account of the life of M. Meursault from the time of his mother s death up to a time evidently just before his execution for the murder of an Arab. It was written by Albert Camus in 1942. Meursault however, is not your typical hero of a story; rather an antihero. He is neither good nor bad, and harbors no emotion. He goes through his life with a preconceivedRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book The Stranger Essay1618 Words   |  7 Pagesmuses Harun, the narrator of Kamel Daoud’s The Meursault Investigation (Daoud 138). Daoud’s novel is full of questions and ramblings such as this one that serve as a response to Albert Camus’ The Stranger, which explores the trial of a French Algerian (Meursault) for killing an Arab man. In The Stranger, Camus fails to name the Arab victim and gives him no backstory nor significant reason for the cause of his murder. In The Meursault Investigation, Daoud gives the dead Arab a name: Musa. M uch likeRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book The Stranger 1670 Words   |  7 PagesAfter reading the first sentence of Albert Camus s masterpiece The Stranger, many readers and critics conclude that its protagonist, Meursault, is either a fool, a madman, or a callous boor: Today, maman died. Or perhaps yesterday, I don t know. I have received a telegram from the nursing home. Mother deceased. Burial tomorrow. Sincerely yours. That doesn t mean anything. It was perhaps yesterday (Camus 1, my translation). Quoting Stuart Gilbert s slightly inaccurate English translationRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book The Stranger 1191 Words   |  5 PagesThe Characterization of Meursault in The Stranger In The Stranger, the author Albert Camus, initially portrays Meursault as a monotonous character lacking emotions toward the events surrounding his life. Meursault reflects indifference at the thought of his girlfriend s proposal in addition to not demonstrating empathy in relation to Raymond s abusive actions toward his girlfriend. Even so, Meursault s character gradually develops from a detached individual to a dynamic person as secondary charactersRead MoreAnalysis Of Strangers Within 940 Words   |  4 Pagesforeign, foreigners . According to the Webster’s Dictionary the term is described as, â€Å"the fear and hatred of strangers and foreigners or of anything that is strange or foreign†. Contact with foreigners from outside and strangers within has accelerated with the advent of the modern age, and also a substantial composition developed in Europe addresses this realism. In case of ‘strangers within’, the most typical example was the Jews on mainly Christian continent. From an early point in era, scholarlyRead MoreStranger Things Analysis955 Words   |  4 PagesAaron Bady’s review of the hit show Stranger Things defends the show and its use of â€Å"play†. Stranger Things quite remarkably manages to encapture elements of the sci-fi, fantasy, romance, and horror genres, making it a universally liked show. However, some critics have disagreed. First, Bady restates the circulating conversations about the show. These particular conversations state that the show is not original. Bady addresses that these findings are indeed correct but â€Å"do not matter.† Then, he discussesRead MoreAnalysis Of The Novel The Stranger988 Words   |  4 Pagesbut the sheep of the Being. This is one way to describe Heidegger’s philosophy of ‘thrownness’. When people are â€Å"thrown† into situations, they feel that it does not have a pattern. Life is a perfect example of this philosophy. In the novel, ‘The Stranger’, by Albert Camus, the author creates an absurd anti-hero in Meursault to demonstrate that, because life is random and inexplicable one has to acknowledge that they don’t have control over events that transpire and that only with hope can one canRead MoreLiving with Strangers Analysis1219 Words   |  5 PagesB. Living With Strangers In 2011 8,244,910 people were living in one of the United States’ most famous cities: New York. New York has the highest population density in the United States with over 27000 people per square mile and it is estimated that 200 languages are spoken in the city. In a city with so many people, different cultures, and languages converts may have difficulties with growing accustomed to a city full of strangers. The American novelist and essayist, Siri Hustvedt, debatesRead MoreAnalysis Of The Poem The Stranger 1249 Words   |  5 PagesIn many works of literature, poetry and art, the sun is used to represent life, divine beauty and strength. In the poem Ah! Sunflower by William Blake for example, the sun represents joy and life. In the novel The Stranger, the author Albert Camus uses the sun in the opposite manner, making it serve as a negative motif throughout the novel. Conversely, Camus uses the sea as a motif to represent the positive and pleasurable feelings that Meursault actually wants to feel. The motifs of the sun and

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Cloning An Controversial Article Titled Experimental...

Rohini Krishnan Professor Sara Goering PHIL 242 21st November 2014 Reproductive Cloning Joshua Lederberg’s controversial article titled â€Å"Experimental Genetic and Human Evolution† promoting human cloning, published in the 60’s sparked the widespread debate on cloning that would continue for decades to come. Leon Kass, leader of the President’s council of bioethics and a prominent figure in this debate, engaged in a lively debate with Lederberg where he argued that the â€Å"programmed reproduction of a man would, in fact, dehumanize him.† Lederberg and Kass are arguably the most well-known figures in the debate surrounding the issue of human reproductive cloning, and their hardline views on this matter, to a large extent, reflect the views of most people I have talked to about human cloning. On reading pieces published by various medical ethicists and philosophers, I have had a hard-time distinguishing what pieces of information we can really trust as the process of human cloning and all of its perceived implic ations because of what they are: perceptions. We still have no real way of knowing what a â€Å"developed† process of cloning would look like and the only way we can really discuss this is to make rational assumptions of how human cloning could take place (the duration, whether the child will have a gestation period within the mother, the potential biological impediments of the process, etc). However, even so, we still have no real idea of how it would actually change societalShow MoreRelatedOrganisational Theory230255 Words   |  922 Pagespsychoanalysis The evolution of management as reflected through the lens of modernist organization theory Perspectives and challenges 2 54 100 148 198 242 282 330 382 432 . . Contents Preface List of figures List of tables Acknowledgements xiii xvii xix xx Chapter 1 Introducing organization theory: what is it, and why does it matter? Introduction What is organization theory? Defining theory What are organizations? The relationship between organization theory and human activities

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Grammar and expression in early Renaissance architecture Essay Example For Students

Grammar and expression in early Renaissance architecture Essay Leon Battrsta Alberti (1404-1472) exempli tie!, the shift Irom the artisan to the learned artist creator. So writes the eminent Alberti scholar Cecil Grayson, and there are perhaps few who would disagree.1 But Graysons seemingly unremarkable assertion implies the acceptance of a single standard and content ot learning, evidently in contrast to the knowledge accumulated by artisans, in which, nevcithcless, Alberti himself showed a lively interest.1 Clearly, Graysons learning is specifically that of humanism, of which Albeiti was a leading, if sometimes ambivalent, exponent Graysons brief account of epochal c hange (published, it should be noted, in 19721 implicitly assigns to Filippo Brunelleschi (1377-1440) the role of artisan, as inventor of technical procedures theorized indeed transmuted into ‘learning by Alberti, an assessment bv and large also conveyed in the latest monograph on the older architect. Indeed. Brunelleschi apprenticed with a goldsmith and never si towed any interest in turning himself into a humanist a careenenham ing strategy followed by his ontemorary, the cx Ã'  asional ate bites Lorenzo Ghiberti, as well as much later, more assiduously and famously, by Andrea Palladio In my view. Brunelleschis achievement depended, even if indirectly, on a crucial late-medieval intellectual disciplinary and discursive domain—a field of learning—that humanism m general opposed and ultimately destroyed. The field in question was the philosophical study of grammar, a subiect of particular interest to Alberti, whose jpproach to the subject was, however, conduc ted on quite different premises and whose emergence as an architect, as I will suggest, depended not only on the careful formulation of a critical position toward Brunelleschis architecture in general, but also on the close involvement in the .assessment and elaboration of a particular Rrunelleschian project. Most acco unts of Albertis career represent his direct experience of architectural planning and design as rposcd to the engagement with theory and the legacy of antiquity as subsequent to the writing of his architectural treatise. l will consider the possibility that  in architecture. as in many of Albertis fields of interest, contemplation and action were dosely linked. In Florence 1441, the recently completed dome ol the cathedra! of Santa Maria del Fiore loomed over a spectacle of remarkable irrelevance to the sacred values and purposes the great building had been constructed to accommodate and express. One by one. men came forward—hardly a priest among them -and before a large and attentive audienc e dec laimed verges, not on the relations between humankind and a transcendent deity, but between man and man. The theme of the verses was friendship; the organizer, who himself wrote a lengthy prose meditation on the- topic for the occasion, was Leon Battista Alberti.8 Since 1434, Alberti had been in Florence with the papal court, which he served as an official in the secretariat of Pope Eugenius IV. The pope was in Florence to preside over a council summoned to negotiate the reconciliation of the wes tern and eastern churches, the latter motivated by the threat of Ottoman power that, in little more than a decade, would engulf Constantinople itself.9 The pope was lodged and the council sessions located at the great Dominican monastery and center of learning of S. Maria Novella. This was the site of the famous exchanges between senior representatives of Greek intellectual traditions and individuals in the western delegation who had risen to prominence through distinction in the new learning ot humanism, which ideally encompassed direct and profound exposure to ancient Greek us well as Latin letters On paper, the council ended successfully in 1439 with Use proclamation in the cathedral ot the union of the Latin ami Gieek churches, though this was never accepted In many Byzantines and was anyway soon overtaken by the Turkish advam e. Tlie advantages sought by the Florentine government in expensively hosting the council, however, were no doutst not primarily of religious nature, but had to do rather with securing the inextricably entwined commercial and cultural prominence of the city. The Medicean regime went to great lengths to attract the council to Florence, an outcome requiring extensive negotiations that were entrusted to Lorenzo de Medici, Cosimos brother. â€Å"Originality in Italian Renaissance Architecture† EssayIe Indeed, the ccrtame itself indicates that the binary distinction ot Latin and the vernacular obscured the range of stylistic idioms and models available to those concerned with literary expression in their native language (much the same was also true, of course, of writing in Latin), It is possible that the certame jurors were more willing to recognize this diversity than Alherti, with his commitment—expressly slated in the preface to 1Ã'…Ã'ŽÐ º three of the .1 Fjuniglia -to a unitary linguistic regime, at least in the context of writing.19 Alberti’s favored entry in the competition was almost certainly that of his friend and fellow papal bureaucrat Leonardo Dati, whose attempt to write Italian hexameters broke brusquely with local traditions of vernacular versification, which were upheld by most other competitors.10 The jurors were not impressed. Alberti s response is known from a highly polemi cal anonymous text known as the Protests in which the author, certainly Alberti himself, represents the lurvs   decision as aroused by envy and as a scornful riposte to the organizer.^ Many scholars have rashly taken Alberti at his word, assuming that the blow of the failed ccrtame was enough to drive Allierti to a mood of Weak pessimism and. a little later, to a return to Latin as his literary language of choice. The central themes ol the Pmtvtta appear in other of Albertis writings, however, suggesting a concern not so much to represent a given state of affairs as to focus attention on general forces affecting human conduct. The author ot the Protesta represents envy as the major force in play, and indeed Alberti proceeded to select envy as the theme ot a second ccrtame. which however never took place, though Dati and others wrote pieces for it. A more compelling reason to read the Pmtcsta skeptically, however, is that it gives the highly implausible impression that only Alberti and the jurors had significant roles to plav on this occasion.M Whatever Albertis reaction, it is surely far mote likely that the award was first of all an act of flattery to the people of Florence and, in particular, the leading c itizen who financed the event and, we may suppose, saw to it that tin cathedral was made available. This was Piero di Cosimo dc Medici, elder son of the effective ruler of Florence since 1434. Pieros key role, along with his younger brother, in the cultural policies of the Medici has been emphasized and documented in many recent studies. Ihere can be no doubt of the larger strategic purpose of he involvement in the events of 1441, while   the projected topic of the second ccrtame, envy, was a particular concern of Pieros father. Cosimo. The ccrtamc cororurto ottered Piero, though sfill young be was horn in 1416). a timely and conspicuous stage on which to display himself as a patron ot culture. Two events of 144(1 had greatly affected both the landing of the Medici in the city and Piero’s potential personal role I he victory ot Anghiari suppressed major external .is well av internal threats to the Medicean â„â€"gime;uand Pieros unc le I oreno, younger brother ar*d Ã'  lose partner of Ð ¡os. i mo rie Medic i, died, leaving a c lear oportuntty and even need for the memb ers of the younger generation to establish themselves in the political and cultural affairs of the city.26 The commission at this time of formal portraits of Piero and his brother was sorely accomplished in part to emphasize their new status.